Home Workshops Products Contact Us

View this newsletter on-line, or read back issues

   

Tharp's Thoughts Weekly Newsletter (View On-Line)

January 20, 2010 - Issue #458

-

Workshops

Van Tharp Workshops Are Coming to New Zealand

Article

Cause and Effect: Thinking Differently for Traders and Investors D.R. Barton Jr.

Trading Education

How to Develop a Winning Trading System That Fits You

Trading Tip

A Brief Update on Gold Analysis and Strategy by Florian Grummes

Free

What Type Trader Are You? Take 3 Minutes to Find Out

Mail Bag

Ask Van Your Questions

 

 Workshops

Van Tharp Workshops Are Coming to Auckland, New Zealand

In February, Van Tharp will bring three extraordinary workshops to New Zealand.

$700 Discounts Are in Effect Right Now. 
Plus, attend all three and save an additional $150 each.  

With the exchange rate of the dollar, now is a great time for you get even more value from one of our workshops.  

 Learn more

Feature

Cause and Effect: 
Thinking Differently for Traders and Investors

 by 

D.R. Barton, Jr.

When I was training to be a chemical engineer, decision making was quite “black and white”:  Learn the rules of the physical world and then apply them.  Learn how molecules combine and separate.  Learn how mass and energy get transferred from place to place.  Learn what is economical and what is not.  And lastly, study hard and get good grades.

Once I was out and practicing engineering in the real world, things weren’t always so cut and dried.  Outside influences often complicated things.  The world of “black and white” became a world with many shades of grey.  In a pristine lab environment (like back at school), molecules always combined the same way.  But in the real world, contaminants could get in the system and reduce yields or create new and undesirable products altogether.

Equipment that was rated at “x” horsepower would always seem to run a little less efficiently because some field condition (normal wear, extra bends and turns, fluctuating temperature and humidity) would strip away efficiency.

In the end, the best engineers in the real world of processing plants were those who could deal most effectively with problems and conditions not found in the text book.  And it will come as no surprise to most that raw intelligence was not directly correlated to success on the floor of a chemical plant.  The best engineers had a certain savviness or what my Dad would call “horse sense” about the best engineers.

And I have found a very similar quality in the best traders and investors that I’ve gotten to know.  They don’t have to be the most book-smart folks (though a few are), but they have a certain grounded grasp of the big picture that allows them to adapt, correct and continue with self-assured ease.

This group of characteristics that turns the average thinker into someone with good common sense or “street smarts” is somewhat difficult to sum up in a few sentences.  But let’s look at some of these concepts or decision making loops that may be most easily modeled.

Trading Is Not Engineering or Accounting

Before we jump into some key decision making characteristics, let’s be clear on the differences between the learning paths for trading and the path for traditional knowledge-based professions like engineering, accounting or medicine.

I’ve often heard professional traders lament that those desiring to learn their craft see a few mouse clicks and some fairly elementary math and assume that they, too, can be consistently successful traders and investors in matter of days or weeks.  Some pro traders will respond to this sentiment with a saying like, “A highly paid doctor or lawyer had to study for years before getting compensated handsomely.  Who would expect to get paid like me after studying just a couple of weeks or months?”

And while part of that thought process is correct (the fact that there are knowledge based aspects to both trading and accounting), there is also a major fallacy in the argument.

Acquiring and demonstrating minimal proficiency in the basic knowledge set needed for engineering or accounting or law or medicine will lead to a well-paid position for the vast majority of participants.  Not so for traders.

The learning path for a trader is more like that of a professional poker player.  Demonstrating knowledge and proficiency in the basic skills only gets you a seat at the table, it doesn’t assure you of an income.  While the poker-trading analogy isn’t perfect, their paths of progression are much more related than that of an doctor or an engineer and a trader.

Let’s look at one key area that makes trading very different from doctoring or engineering:  the search for certainty or “What happens when you do everything right and it still turns out wrong?”

Doctors, engineers and indeed most professions live in a cause and effect world.  If you do A, then a very high percentage of the time B will follow.  There are notable exceptions, when a treatment doesn’t work or a product line gets contaminated, but by and large if you do the correct action, you get the correct result.

Trading is quite different.  A trader can have the perfect set-up and entry, execute everything perfectly and still have the trade result in a loss.  While traders lose money in this situation, that’s a problem perhaps but probably not the biggest problem.  The largest problem for most people is the mental disconnect between cause (doing everything right)  and effect (losing money).  That result conflicts with their classical education which does not equip them with the tool set required for managing uncertain outcomes. 

If we do things exactly right and still only get the desired result 60% of the time (or 50% or even 40% in long term trend following systems), traditional cause-and-effect  thinking can easily make damaging conclusions.  Since cause and effect seem only causally (no pun intended) related...

  • The rules really aren’t good and don’t serve me.

  • I no longer need to follow my rules exactly. (or at all)

  • I can tweak the rules so I am in better control (or at least feel like I’m in control)

When a trade or group of trades doesn’t come out well, our typical human reaction to solve a problem kicks in.  Almost all traders and investors tweak their systems and strategies prematurely, based on too little data (too small of a sample size).  So many people have been trained in an education system that teaches us to solve a problem if we don’t get the desired outcome with pure cause and effect thinking.  Dealing with highly complex systems with great levels of uncertainty is just not in most people’s basic educational background or experience.

So what?

The good news is that cause-and-effect thinking works in most areas of our personal and professional life.  And it is deeply rooted in our need to be right. It does not, however, serve traders well. 

A useful solution to overcome our mental “cause and effect” disconnect is simple to describe, but it’s very difficult to adopt for the long term: broaden your view of trading results.  We must allow our trading and investing strategies to play out long enough to reach their expected profitability.  Fretting and wringing your hands over the results of every trade is not very useful and can lead to premature judgments and tweaking.

Each trade should be evaluated ONLY in terms of whether or not we followed our trading rules without regard for the dollars and cents results.  Reset your cause and effect decision process only after you have a group of 30 or 50 trades (or an even higher number if you trade more frequently).  Then you can evaluate cause and effect on a statistically valid data set, not on any one trade or group of trades that have so many more outside influences than one can ever hope to control.

Reviewing only large data sets creates a discipline that serves several purposes:

  • It reduces stress by telling our mind that no single trade matters very much, as long as we follow our rules.

  • It reduces the variability of results over time because we’re only adjusting our system or strategy after an appropriate interval of time.

  • It greatly increases the chances of profitability because we do fewer of the systematic things that cause losses.

No one trade is important (as long as you always respect your stop loss)—it is just a useful data point as part of the larger whole.  Allow yourself and your strategy the luxury of time.  And don’t be surprised if lower stress and greater profitability follow close behind.

Great Trading,

D. R.

About D.R. Barton, Jr.:  A passion for the systematic approach to the markets and lifelong love of teaching and learning have propelled D.R. Barton, Jr. to the top of the investment and trading arena.  He is a regularly featured guest on both Report on Business TV, and WTOP News Radio in Washington, D.C., and has been a guest on Bloomberg Radio. His articles have appeared on SmartMoney.com and Financial Advisor magazine. You may contact D.R. at  "drbarton" at "iitm.com".

Disclaimer

Trading Education

How to Develop a Winning Trading System that Fits You  

Gain all the benefits from Dr. Van Tharp's years of modeling traders and from his research on how good trading systems are developed in this audio program. 

This program will familiarize you with the key parts of a system, give you good examples of each part, and help you develop appropriate setups, and an appropriate entry and stop loss. 20 CDs, plus a workbook. $795.00

Learn More About How This Program Could Benefit You...

 Order Now

Trading Tip

Gold Analysis and Strategy: Gold Spot Price Analysis

 by 

Florian Grummes

Dear Tharp’s Thoughts Readers,

First of all I want to wish all of you a wonderful and happy New Year!  May it be a year full of happiness, love, abundance, peace and success for us all.

Also, I must apologize for not writing earlier. I have taken a short break from writing because I have been travelling since early December, so I have not been able to send out any gold market updates.

My Views on the Gold Market

My initial price target high of US$1,250 was only slightly off the mark. The correction that followed was pretty hefty and fast. Since the beginning of 2010, gold has seemed to be on the way to new highs again. The chart still looks very bullish. The old high around US$1,070 has been successfully tested for support and the seasonal pattern is extremely bullish for the next 2-3 months.  Therefore, I will stick to my final price target at around US$1,550 - US$1,600 for this up-leg. The time-frame for the top is somewhere between mid-March and mid-May. After the top, we have to expect a correction period that should last for probably the rest of the year.

Short term it seems like a typical triangle pattern is developing. Gold should not fall under US$1,100 anymore and should take out resistance around US$1,145 - US$1,160 within the next 1-2 weeks.  If gold closes clearly under US$1,100, my scenario regarding another massive price advance will be disproved!  Either way, please be prepared for extreme volatility in the gold market. Daily movements of US$50-100 could be normal for awhile and should be expected. While I am not trading this market right now, simply stay long, respect your stops, and be patient. The risk to be on the wrong side of short term moves is big.

I will send out the regular detailed report after my return to Germany. Either way, you will hear from me again when it’s time to change from long to short in the gold market.

Sunny regards and much success,

Florian Grummes

About the Author: Florian Grummes (born in 1975 in Munich) has been studying and trading the Gold market since 2003. Beside a lot of self-development workshops and seminars his experience in the gold market comes from trading and investing his own money to finally become a very successful self-employed precious metals trader and investor. Along with his trading business, he is also a very creative and successful composer, songwriter and music producer.

Disclaimer

Feedback

Ask Van...

Everything that we do here at the Van Tharp Institute is to help you improve as a trader and investor. Therefore, we love to get your feedback, both positive and negative!

Feel free to click below to leave us any comments so that we can serve you better. Or, send Van a question that you would like for him to answer. 

Click Here for Feedback Form

Trading Education

What Type Trader Are You?

Take 3-5 Minutes to find out. 

www.TharpTraderTest.com

Learn your trader type, your strengths, challenges and solutions. 

Pass it on to your friends! It fun and it's free!

 

Email us  [email protected]

The Van Tharp Institute does not support spamming in any way, shape or form. This is a subscription based newsletter.

To change your e-mail Address, click here

Or, paste this address in your browser: http://www.iitm.com/privacy_policy.htm


800-385-4486 * 919-466-0043 *  Fax 919-466-0408

Back to top

Copyright 2010 the International Institute of Trading Mastery, Inc.

.

.

.

Quote:
“Faith is taking the first step even when you don't see the whole staircase." ~Martin Luther King, Jr.

....

.

.

.

.

Trouble viewing this issue?

  View On-line.

....

 

 

 


Buy Now

.

.

.

..

Back to top

.

..

.

.

.

Tharp Concepts Explained...

 

- Psychology of Trading

- System Development

- Risk and R-Multiples

- Position Sizing

- Expectancy

- Business Planning

Learn the concepts...

..~~

.Back to top

~

~~~

Free Trading Simulation Game

A computerized version of Van's famous "marble game."

It is designed to teach you the important principles of proper position sizing.

Download the 1st three levels of the game for free. Register now.

~

.~

.

.

Share this newsletter with a friend!

..

.

.Back to top

.

.

..

.

.....

Share this newsletter with a friend!

~.~~~

~

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back to top

 

Follow Van through Twitter.

Back to top